
ne
question that arises from time to time among fractal
explorers is, "What kind of computer hardware is best
for rendering fractals?" Given the rapid pace at which
technology is advancing, any information I present may
become outdated at any moment. Nevertheless, I will
try to keep this page current. (And you can observe the
date at the top of this page so you'll know exactly how
current this info is.)
Generally speaking, a faster computer will render fractals
faster. But when comparing two systems, you may not always
be able to test fractal rendering speed before making a
purchase. Which brand of processor is best? Which
motherboard? How much memory? The precise answers to these
questions will depend on the specific fractal software
you're using, but for the most part all fractal software
shares the same needs.
I'm going to assume that we're talking about x86-based
systems, the kind that run Windows. Those of you looking
for Mac systems have fewer choices, but that makes it
easy: buy the fastest Mac you want. Now, on to "PC" systems.

This is the single most important component in any fractal
rendering computer, since it's the part that actually does
all the calculating. Faster is better, but at the moment,
AMD's Athlon is roughly equal to Intel's Pentium III, MHz
for MHz. That means a 600MHz Athlon is going to be about
as fast as a 600MHz Pentium III (for fractals). You will
likely find, however, that the Athlon processor is cheaper
than the Intel counterpart.
Sometime within the next few months, AMD is expected to
release new versions of the Athlon processor which will
address some of the issues that keep it at the same speed
as the Pentium III. Once these new Athlons are available,
they should be substantially faster than
equivalently-clocked Pentium IIIs.
Athlons are in high demand right now, so if you're shopping
for a new system you might not find one. If you can't get
an Athlon system, don't fret; the Pentium III is still a
good buy and will not disappoint you.
Chips to avoid: AMD's old processor, the K6. The
Athlon is great, but the K6 is terrible for fractals. So
is any processor brand besides AMD and Intel. These chips
just don't have the floating-point performance of the
Athlon or the Pentium III. Don't be tempted by the low
price.

I really hate to mention this, because I imagine most of
the people visiting this page won't be building their own
computers, they will be buying a pre-built system. But in
the case of the AMD Athlon it's important to mention that
there is a substantial performance difference between
motherboards. The "standard" Athlon motherboard is based
on the AMD 751 chip; this works, it's reliable, but it's
not as fast at some things as it could be. If you can get
an Athlon motherboard that's based on the VIA KX133 chip,
this is much better. These motherboards are scarce, though,
so for now you're most likely to get one of these by
buying a pre-built system. (Ironic, huh?) If you don't
know what kind of motherboard is in the system, ask the
seller.
If you're buying a Pentium III system, there isn't as much
difference between motherboards, so don't worry about it
too much.

You can never have too much memory. Well, OK, maybe you
can. But at a bare minimum, you want 64M of RAM if you're
going to be running Ultra Fractal. The more memory you
have, the faster the program can deal with multi-layer
images, and that can mean quite a difference while you're
building your fractals. If you can afford it, go ahead and
get 256M of RAM. That way you can open other programs while
working on fractals and not immediately have Windows churn
your hard drive as it runs out of RAM.

Those spiffy new video cards look really neat, and you
might hear a salesman tell you it will make the computer
faster. Well, in some ways, yes, it can. Especially if
you plan on using your fractal computer for a few games.
(Go ahead, I won't tell.) But when it comes to fractals,
having a super-accelerated DDR 4x AGP video card with
128M of RAM isn't going to make a whole lot of difference,
except to your pocketbook. If you get a video card that
can do 32-bit color at at least 1152x864, you're doing
fine. I'm partial to nVidia TNT- or TNT2-based video cards;
the drivers are reliable, the Windows performance is great,
and the picture is sharp. You'll do equally well with a
Matrox video card.

Don't waste time with anything less than a 17" monitor.
Fractal programs will run at whatever resolution you want,
but like any other graphics program, you need room for all
your toolbars, windows, and knobs, in addition to the fractal
image. If you can afford to get a 19" monitor, go for itall
that space will be put to good use.
You also want to make sure that the monitor you get has a
good picture. Generally, the cheaper monitors are cheaper
for a reason: they don't look as sharp, they can't handle
the refresh rates of better monitors, and they can appear
very dark, even with the brightness and contrast adjusted.
Try to avoid the cheapest monitors.

You need a hard drive to put all those fractals on. But when
you start rendering dozens of true-color fractals at large
sizes, you'll discover just how quickly all that space can
vanish. So if you can manage it, a CD-RW drive (that lets you
write your images onto CDs) is a great archiving tool. You
can use it to back up the rest of your system as well. (You
were going to back your system up, weren't you?)

The rest of the components in a computer system are up to
you, and are based more on what else you'll be using the
computer for besides fractals. This should give you an idea,
though, of what kinds of things to look for in a fractal-generating
computer.
|
|